Angry mob
Michael Graham explains that although “expressing support for values like individual responsibility, personal liberty, and economic freedom” was once very common and not seen as being radical, today these actions makes one become part of an “extremist rabble”. Despite America’s long history in questioning authority through rallies and marches, in the modern era, specifically during Barack Obama’s time in office, one’s “loyalty…decency, [and] sanity” can become questioned through the same actions. Instead of being a revolutionary, one merely becomes part of an “angry mob”.[2] Although “the Obama elites and media sycophants often complain about the ‘angry mob’”, it is rare that the motivations behind the opposition are looked into and analyzed. [3] After Republican Scott Brown won office, columnist Charles Krauthammer described the mindset of what he viewed as angry mob voters: “[they have an] inchoate, unthinkable lashing-out at whoever happens to be in power - even at your liberal betters who are forcing on you an agenda that you can’t see is in your own interest”.[4]
The major stereotype surrounding angry mobs involves a farmer wielding a pitchfork.
Link